Main Article Content

Centre for Cybercrime and Economic Crime

Abstract

Digital forensics has become a fundamental pillar of modern justice systems. Its role is no longer confined to cybercrime investigations; rather, it now extends to most criminal cases, as smartphones, cloud accounts, social media platforms, and electronic transactions have evolved into primary sources of judicial evidence. This trend has been reinforced by the expansion of the digital economy and the increasing rates of internet and social media usage across the Arab world, resulting in a growing volume of digital data and increasing complexity in its sources.

In parallel with this quantitative and qualitative expansion, several challenges have emerged concerning the ability of digital forensic laboratories to achieve balanced development in human resources, technical infrastructure, and procedural timelines. These challenges may contribute to case backlogs and delays in issuing technical reports, thereby affecting the speed of judicial proceedings and the consistency of judicial rulings. Such challenges have become even more pronounced with the growing use of artificial intelligence tools in generating and modifying data, and the associated concerns regarding the authenticity of digital content and digital evidence.

Against this backdrop, the paper explores the option of engaging the private sector in the management of digital forensic laboratories as a practical approach to enhancing efficiency and accelerating the administration of justice.

The paper is based on a comparative analysis of four organizational experiences involving private-sector participation in the management and operation of digital forensic laboratories: the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Australia, and Singapore. These cases represent diverse organizational models across four different continents and varying legal systems with clear international influence.

The paper concludes by proposing three alternatives, the most prominent of which is the hybrid model based on governmental oversight combined with private-sector operational utilization, as it represents the most balanced option in terms of efficiency and judicial admissibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Security Policy Analysis
Copyright Information